Candidates will need to refer to their work for the Foundation Portfolio and
Advanced Portfolio. Additionally, they may make reference to other media
production work but this is strictly optional.
Level 1 (0-9 marks)
The answer is descriptive and may offer limited clarity. There is little, if any, evaluation of progress. Examples are partly relevant and their significance in relation to the set question is partly clear. The answer offers minimal use of relevant media terminology.
Some simple ideas have been expressed. There will be some errors of spelling, punctuation and grammar which will be noticeable and intrusive. Writing may also lack legibility.
Level 2 (10-15 marks)
Candidates offer a mostly clear, partly relevant and narrow range of examples of digital technology and creative decision making. The account of progress made is limited. Examples are described with some discussion of their significance in relation to the set question. The answer makes basic use of relevant media terminology.
Some simple ideas have been expressed in an appropriate context. There are likely to be some errors of spelling, punctuation and grammar of which some may be noticeable and intrusive.
Level 1 (0-9 marks)
The answer is descriptive and may offer limited clarity. There is little, if any, evaluation of progress. Examples are partly relevant and their significance in relation to the set question is partly clear. The answer offers minimal use of relevant media terminology.
Some simple ideas have been expressed. There will be some errors of spelling, punctuation and grammar which will be noticeable and intrusive. Writing may also lack legibility.
Level 2 (10-15 marks)
Candidates offer a mostly clear, partly relevant and narrow range of examples of digital technology and creative decision making. The account of progress made is limited. Examples are described with some discussion of their significance in relation to the set question. The answer makes basic use of relevant media terminology.
Some simple ideas have been expressed in an appropriate context. There are likely to be some errors of spelling, punctuation and grammar of which some may be noticeable and intrusive.
Level 3 (16-20 marks)
There is some sense of progression and of how examples have been selected, and some useful descriptions of the use of digital tools. Progress made is described and evaluated with clarity.
Candidates offer a mostly clear, mostly relevant and reasonable range of examples of digital technology in relation to the set question. The answer makes proficient use of media terminology throughout.
Straightforward ideas have been expressed with some clarity and fluency. Arguments are generally relevant, though may stray from the point of the question. There will be some errors of spelling, punctuation and grammar but these are unlikely to be intrusive or obscure meaning.
There is some sense of progression and of how examples have been selected, and some useful descriptions of the use of digital tools. Progress made is described and evaluated with clarity.
Candidates offer a mostly clear, mostly relevant and reasonable range of examples of digital technology in relation to the set question. The answer makes proficient use of media terminology throughout.
Straightforward ideas have been expressed with some clarity and fluency. Arguments are generally relevant, though may stray from the point of the question. There will be some errors of spelling, punctuation and grammar but these are unlikely to be intrusive or obscure meaning.
Level 4 (21-25 marks)
There is a clear sense of progression and of how examples have been selected, and a range of articulate reflections on the use of digital technology. There is a fluent evaluation of progress made over time. Candidates offer a range of specific, relevant and clear examples of digital skills and creative decision making. The use of media terminology is excellent.
Complex issues have been expressed clearly and fluently using a style of writing appropriate to the complex subject matter. Sentences and paragraphs, consistently relevant, have been well structured, using appropriate technical terminology. There may be few, if any, errors of spelling, punctuation and grammar.
There is a clear sense of progression and of how examples have been selected, and a range of articulate reflections on the use of digital technology. There is a fluent evaluation of progress made over time. Candidates offer a range of specific, relevant and clear examples of digital skills and creative decision making. The use of media terminology is excellent.
Complex issues have been expressed clearly and fluently using a style of writing appropriate to the complex subject matter. Sentences and paragraphs, consistently relevant, have been well structured, using appropriate technical terminology. There may be few, if any, errors of spelling, punctuation and grammar.
Click to enlarge image
Candidate 1
Candidate 2
No comments:
Post a Comment